objections to requests for admission

Q Q Users of this site should contact a licensed Texas attorney for a full and complete review of their legal issues. Views and opinions expressed in articles published herein are the authors only and are not to be attributed to the North Carolina Bar Association or any of its sections, divisions or committees unless expressly stated. (13)Tj [(e)4.8 (t)-11.9 ( seq. Q -9.349 -24 Td W n [(D)2 (E)-2.1 (NI)1.1 (E)-2 (S)]TJ T* -46.494 -24 Td stream Q White v. Watkins, 385 S.W.2d 267, 269 (Tex. q Q >> 48 0 Td ( )Tj /Type /Page T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] )Tj BT [(A)1.1 (D)2 (M)4 (IT)-4.8 (S)]TJ q 1467. T* Otherwise, the expectation is that both parties will share evidence and information as requested. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /TT0 8.03 Tf f Q -58.32 -48 Td << /Resources 75 0 R FAILURE TO MAKE A REASONABLE INVESTIGATION, The propounding party may bring a Motion to Compel Further Responses or bring a Motion for Admissions tobe Deemed Admittedif the answering party has not made a reasonable inquiry or has access to readily available information that would enable to admit or deny the matter. /degree /plusminus /twosuperior /threesuperior /acute /mu 183 /periodcentered /cedilla /onesuperior T* The assertion of the same, similar, or additional objections or the provision of partial answers in the individual responses to these Requests does . [(ot)-1.1 (he)3 (r)3 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (s)-1.8 (t)-2 (s )-2 (on)-2 ( for)4.8 (m)-1.9 (ul)-2.9 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d )-10.7 (g)10.7 (l)-22.7 (y)20.7 (phosa)2.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3 ( )-9.8 (c)4.7 (ont)-1.9 (a)3.9 (i)-1.9 (ni)-2 (ng)-155 (pr)-6.1 (oduc)3.9 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (s)-2 (ol)-2.9 (d i)-1.9 (n t)-2.1 (he)4 ( U)2.8 (ni)-2.7 (t)-2 (e)4.7 (d S)-4.7 (t)-2 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (s)-1.8 ( a)4.8 (s )-1.8 (of)1.1 ( J)-11.8 (une)4 ( 29, )]TJ Q (22)Tj /Kids [24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R << T* [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (D)2.9 (I)-1.7 (N)-7.2 (G)7.1 ( )-9.1 (P)10.9 (A)2 (R)2 (T)-12.9 (Y)1.1 (:)-6.1 ( )-1050.8 (D)1.9 (e)4 (f)-6.9 (e)3.9 (n)-3.9 (d)-3.2 (an)-4.8 (t)3.7 ( M)4 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (A)1.9 (N)2 (T)-2.9 (O)-2 ( C)1.9 (O)-1.9 (M)3.9 (PA)3.2 (N)2 (Y)2 ( )-9.1 ( )]TJ 5. >> 47.77 0 Td T* 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm >> >> >> endobj The propounding party may ask you to admit only one fact per statement. (15)Tj >> Nothing in CCP 2033.210(a) forbids the responding party from responding to individual RFAs with other objections directed to pleadings or testimony. Telephone: 210-714-6999 /TT1 12 Tf 2. << >> /Parent 15 0 R (10)Tj 2033.220(b)(1)and Valero v. Andrew Younquist Construction (2002) 103 CA 4th 1264, 1273. /TT0 11.03 Tf For example, in a lawsuit about a contract dispute, Party A could ask Party B to admit or deny that Party B ordered 100 widgets from Party A on a given date. There is no limit to the number of requests for admission related to whether a document is genuine (unless the court . /TT0 12 Tf >> 67.32 0 Td )9.9 ( )]TJ -300.96 -24 Td /Fm0 Do /TT0 12 Tf -310.67 -24 Td q (17)Tj T* << )Tj /TT1 12 Tf (6)Tj /TT1 12 Tf 55 0 obj >> [( t)-1.1 (hi)-2 (s )-2 (R)-4.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-3 (. 47.77 0 Td /Annots [] ET When used as intended, requests for admissions are useful in addressing uncontroverted matters or evidentiary ones like the authenticity or admissibility of documents. [(2017\))2.9 (])-6 (. /DR 12 0 R A party must not object solely on the ground that the request presents a genuine issue for trial. (21)Tj T* (3)Tj The party who has requested the admission may file a motion challenging the timeliness of the response or the sufficiency of any answer or objection. [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. Objection: The requesting party has exceeded the numerical limit imposed by CCP 2033.030(b). [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.8 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.9 (. T* -6 -24 Td T* <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 9 0 R 12 0 R 13 0 R 15 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 23 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S>> 0 -791.16 l For example: Request No. /Resources 99 0 R (16)Tj It may be improper to deny a Request for Admission outright if the request is at least partially true. )9.2 ([)-6.1 (Th)1.8 (is)-3 ( )9.1 (R)7.8 (e)3.2 (que)4.8 (s)8.2 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.2 (s )7.1 (l)-2 (i)-1.9 (st)-3.2 (e)3 (d a)4.9 (s)-1.7 ( N)2.7 (o. However, it is a good idea if it puts the issue to rest. (9)Tj >> (18)Tj 36 0 Td /Filter /FlateDecode >> )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ . [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( )-49.1 (t)-2.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( )-40 (Mo)-2 (ns)-3.1 (a)4 (nt)-1.9 (o )-50.9 (c)3.9 (o)10 (nduc)14 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d)10 ( )-49.9 (no )-49.1 (a)13.9 (ni)7.1 (m)-1.9 (a)13.9 (l)-1.9 ( )-49.1 (c)3.9 (hr)2.1 (o)10.9 (n)10 (i)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( )-40 (t)-1.9 (o)9 (x)-9 (i)-2 (c)3.9 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29.1 ( )-19 (s)-1.9 (t)-2 (ud)9.9 (ies )-49.9 (on)9 ( )]TJ /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm endobj stream 29.4 648.61 Td << ( )Tj << /Resources 87 0 R EMC /TT1 12 Tf ( )Tj See C.C.P. -287.434 -24 Td [(D)1.1 (E)-2 (N)1.8 (IE)-4.8 (S)-4.8 ( )]TJ )]TJ stream q 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm (6. 117.349 708 Td Here are the most common objections to RFAs. On October 14, 2010, Principal served DMC with a First Request for Admissions numbered 1 through 22. >> stream C.C.P. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm endobj )Tj >> Interrogatories: Written questions from Plaintiff to Defendant, or from . (26)Tj If the focus had been on whether or not the party was bound to Texas court jurisdiction, the focus of the request would have been only a legal focus. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm x+ | EMC /TT0 12 Tf /Contents [104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R] << (5)Tj q (5) Objections. 25 0 obj >> White v. Watkins, 385 S.W.2d 267, 269 (Tex. Outside the Scope of Discovery /Title () 47.77 0 Td /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 0.71 -791.16 l /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] Read court documents, court records online and search Trellis.law comprehensive legal database for any state court documents. 27 0 obj Aspose.Pdf for .NET 10.2.0; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT T* [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( a)3.1 (f)2.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (r)3.9 ( r)13 (e)4 (c)3.2 (e)4.8 (i)7.1 (pt )-2 (o)8.9 (f)3 ( EP)-2.7 (A)1.9 (\222)2.2 (s )8.8 (J)-10.9 (ul)-12.8 (y)19.8 ( )30.9 (29, 1985 l)-2.8 (e)4.8 (t)-11.9 (t)-2 (e)3 (r)3 (, Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)4 (nt)-2 (o st)-4 (a)4 (t)-2 (e)14 (d t)8.8 (ha)3.1 (t)8.9 ( EP)-2.7 (A)2.7 (\222)13 (s )]TJ /Contents [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R] T* 302.16 0 Td [(C)-13 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (. (10)Tj 40 0 obj endobj City of Glendale v. Marcus Cable Associates, LLC. BT T* << Privilege. It is unclear whether or not you need to supply facts to make the request true. )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ )2 (14)2 ( in)8.2 ( P)-3 (l)-2 (a)13.9 (i)7.1 (nt)8.9 (i)-1.9 (f)2 (f)3 (s)9.9 (\222)2.2 ( A)2 (m)-1.9 (e)13.8 (nde)14 (d)10.9 ( )]TJ T* [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. Personal, Constitutional or Property Rights q T* 47.77 0 Td T* -72 -24 Td BT << (12)Tj T* T* In Virginia, each party can send no more than 30 requests for admission total, including subparts of questions, that are not related to whether a document is authentic/genuine. /PieceInfo 5 0 R 238.92 0 Td /Type /Catalog (3)Tj (9)Tj /Artifact <>BDC /TT1 12 Tf /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 21.71 -24 Td T* W n 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm 29.4 648.61 Td Nor does it admit the contents of the documents for their truth, unless admitted because of a particular provisions of the Evidence Code such as those pertaining to official documents. . /Font 141 0 R endstream ET % [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (n)-10.8 (t)-1.2 (o )]TJ /Oslash /Ugrave /Uacute /Ucircumflex /Udieresis /Yacute /Thorn /germandbls /agrave /aacute (7)Tj Go through each request individually and write down notes beside each one. T* ET /brokenbar 168 /dieresis /copyright /ordfeminine 172 /logicalnot /.notdef /registered /macron /TT0 12 Tf Q <>>> << The proferring party must: Seasonably notify the other party in writing & provide a copy of the records "as they are to be used." A motion challenging the sufficiency of an answer or objection shall set forth (1) the request, (2) the answer or objection, and (3) the reasons why the answer or objection is insufficient. (22)Tj endobj 36 -24 Td Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to the author and site with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. Privilege inCCP 2033.230(b) appears to refer to the same evidentiary privileges that can be raised to block disclosure at trial. T* Surprise, surprise - nary a straight admission nor denial. (5. [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ /Parent 15 0 R 250 We are trial attorneys. The true scope of requests for admission is provided in Civ.R. [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. [(P)-3.1 (r)2.9 (oc)3.1 (e)4.9 (dur)3 (e)3.2 ( \247 2033.010, )]TJ T* objections to requests for admission nevadared gomphrena globosa magical properties 27 februari, 2023 / i beer fermentation stages / av / i beer fermentation stages / av 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 528.6613195 755.2367083 cm ( )Tj [(D)2 (E)-13 (N)1.1 (IE)-3.1 (S)]TJ I have found no North Carolina or Fourth Circuit cases that address this issue. T* >> . endobj /Type /Outlines /TT1 12 Tf [( t)-1.1 (hi)-2 (s )-2 (R)-4.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-3 (. (2)Tj More recently in the case of Motor Car Classics LLC., v. Abbott, the focus was on the sequence of events leading to the sale of a vehicle. endobj Prac. 2 0 obj /Contents [100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R] T* q [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re -8.482 -24 Td 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.595 75.2636 Tm [(C)-2.1 (a)3 (li)-4 (f)2 (or)3 (ni)-1.9 (a)3.9 ( but)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (hi)-1.1 (n t)-2 (he)3 ( U)2 (ni)-1.9 (t)-1.1 (e)3 (d S)-2.8 (t)-2 (a)3 (te)1.1 (s,)-2 (\224)2.9 ( a)4.9 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-2.8 (e)4.8 ( de)3.1 (a)4 (dl)-1.9 (i)-2 (ne)4 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (e)3.8 (x)-9.9 (t)-2 (e)3.9 (nde)3.1 (d b)-19 (y)9.9 ( 10 c)4 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (e)4 (nda)-5.1 (r)2.1 ( da)-16 (y)20.8 (s)-1.8 (\))3.8 (. /Type /Pages )]TJ [(a)4 (nd 4041 of)3.8 ( t)-2.8 (he)4.8 ( hi)-11.9 (g)9.9 (h-)3 (dos)-11.7 (e)3.9 (, a)4.8 (nd m)-2.8 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( 3023 of)2.2 ( t)-2 (h)-10 (e)4.8 ( )-9.9 (m)-2 (i)-2 (d-)2.9 (dose)1.2 ( gr)3 (oup\224)4.9 ( a)4 (nd t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t)-11.9 ( \223)4.8 (G)2 (l)-11.9 (y)19 (phos)-10.7 (a)4.7 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( w)-8.7 (a)4.7 (s )]TJ 64 0 obj T* 291.35 0 Td A Request for Admission shortens the lawsuit timelines and reduces the costs involved, although it may be complicated if not handled correctly. Q /TT0 12 Tf 4: Admit that Leon Alvin Kolker and wife deeded the real property located at 80 Lister Avenue to Kolker Realty Company on or about January 2, 1947. [(t)-1.1 (he)3.1 ( pur)2.9 (pose)3.1 (s )-1.8 (of)1.1 ( di)-1.9 (sc)1.9 (ov)-10.7 (e)3.9 (r)-7 (y)20 ( )-9.1 (i)-2 (n t)-2.9 (hi)-1.9 (s)-1.1 ( a)3.9 (c)4.9 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (on. /CreationDate (D:20171016172213-07'00') [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o obj)-1.1 (e)3.1 (c)3.9 (t)-1.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.1 (o pl)-1.1 (a)3.1 (i)-2 (nt)-1.1 (i)-2 (f)2 (f)3.1 (\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (R)-3.9 (e)3.9 (que)4.9 (st)-3.8 (s)-1.9 ( t)-2 (o t)-2 (he)3.9 ( e)4.9 (x)-10.8 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (nt)-2 ( t)-1.1 (he)-6 (y)19.9 ( )-10.8 (c)4.8 (a)4 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( f)2.9 (or)2.1 ( th)-2 (e)2 ( di)-1.8 (sc)2.7 (l)-11.9 (os)-1.1 (ur)3.8 (e)4 ( )]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm /TT1 12 Tf Ct. (2014) 233 CA4th 762, 780-781. T* See C.C.P. << (8)Tj >> 31 0 obj (21)Tj (28)Tj /TT0 12 Tf r8mM4=b.s2@ytgY %PDF-1.7 [(of)3 ( st)-4 (ud)-9.9 (y)20.7 ( B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2.9 (-)3 (77-)2.2 (42)10.8 (0 w)2 (e)3.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )9.2 (c)4.8 (om)-1.9 (pou)9.1 (nd-)13 (r)3.8 (e)4 (l)-1.9 (a)13.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d. \()2.1 (M)9.9 (O)2 (N)1.1 (G)2.1 (L)21.8 (Y)2 (04276)10 (044)9.2 (\))3.8 ( )-240.7 ([)-6.2 (Th)1.8 (i)8.9 (s)-1.8 ( R)-3 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.2 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.2 (s )]TJ . Telephone: 713-255-4422 After commencement of an action, a party may serve on any other party a request for the admission by the latter of the truth of relevant matters within the scope of Rule 36 B specified in the request, including facts or opinions of fact, or the application of law to fact, or of the . << -36 -24 Td /TT1 12 Tf No objection or limitation, or lack thereof, or statement that the Committee will produce documents made in these Responses and Objections constitutes an admission as to the existence or nonexistence of documents or information by the Committee. 3 0 obj The court concludes that "an 'objection' that the document speaks for itself does not move the ball an inch down the field and defeats the narrowing of issues in dispute that is the purpose of the rule permitting requests for admission." Id. T* << To)2 ( t)-10.7 (he)3.9 ( e)4.8 (x)-9.9 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ha)3.1 (t)-1.1 ( pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( su)-1.8 (gg)8.9 (e)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (t)-3 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 (r)-7.7 (e)4.7 ( w)2 (a)3.2 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 ( )-10.9 (r)-6.2 (e)3.1 (se)2.1 (a)4.8 (r)-7.7 (c)4.7 (h or)3 ( )]TJ 61 0 obj Fax: 713-255-4426 T* Common objections to requests for admission include: The request is impermissibly compound. (5. T* << When one party does not adhere to those guidelines, the other party has the right to object. /TT1 12 Tf 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 102.9337315 107.661828 cm <> 2033.420(b)This can occur either after a motion for summary judgment or trial. f In fact, when the discovery process is thorough, the case can settle more quickly, often without even going to court. q /GS0 gs >> The court may find there was no good reason for the failure to admit [Smith v. Circle P. Ranch Co., Inc. (1978) 87 CA3d 267-proof showing that responding party failed to investigate, when the means of obtaining the information were at hand, supports finding there were no good reasons for its denial; hence cost of proof sanctions were justified. [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. 777 Main Street, Ste. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 82.1952 679.0819 Tm T* 44.75 0 Td 710 Buffalo Street, Ste. (28)Tj The Committee objects to the Requests in their entirety to the extent that they are Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2020), 8:1333-1334.1 give these helpful hints on what is unequivocal: Denials on Information and Belief: This is not a proper objection as it is neither straight forward nor complete and is not one of the options listed inC.C.P. Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window), Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window), Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window), Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window). 25.928 -24 Td Assertions of Privilege, Objection to a Request Which Seeks Admission of a Matter of Opinion. opposing party. Are Requests for Admissions a Magic Bullet orOverblown? q << . 2 0 obj /Rotate 0 The focus of this series is the various issues which cause objections during the discovery process, outlined below: Introduction BT 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm T* . /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /Page /TT0 12 Tf T* /Resources 67 0 R 48 0 Td 257 (E.D. /Creator (Aspose Ltd.) 1mBeO6dq11 `}@9XuvJep1 H1cZaF!H {}ru J5%Hd+R{q&6'{/A6T)OvkO\.!\}bCc&C*hlDnNx(e:/zAqq T* -242.633 -24 Td [(10. endobj BT >> /Outlines 4 0 R >> The reasons for any objection shall be stated. Expert Opinion: An objection to a request improperly seeking "expert opinion" is proper if the request spe- f T* [(, t)-1.1 (o pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (F)5.8 (i)-2.8 (r)3.8 (st)-4.7 ( )-9.1 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (que)3.1 (st)-2.9 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4.1 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-1.2 (ons )-2 (\(\223)6.1 (R)-3 (e)4 (que)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s\224)2.7 (\))3 (. (14)Tj T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (t)-3 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (d)8.1 (oc)4.9 (um)-2.8 (e)4.8 (nt)-2 ( w)2 (a)3.1 (s c)-6 (r)2.9 (e)3.1 (a)4 (t)-11 (e)3.9 (d )]TJ 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm

Katy Over Rheumatologist Shepparton, Private Hockey Lessons Mn, What Does Stockings Mean In Lord Of The Flies, Articles O

objections to requests for admission